🔗 Share this article

Itranspired Ruben Amorim endured a loss to lower-league opposition. Survive losing a crucial continental showpiece versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive home defeats against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, squandering the team's best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, calling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to engage. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. The most distracted of readers will notice the irony here: a coach who often railed his squad for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most intimidating sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode seems to paint the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to view him as merely a functionary within the club's structure: a man who owed his position largely to his friendship with his former boss Omar Berrada rather than any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which United’s mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

The Strategic Conflict Over System & Ideology

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox who being involved in the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties faced pushback. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when delivered from the mouth with the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of three England caps and a role in a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually he might agree to outline his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is walking away with a full payout, without any penalty clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – men like him – simply operate on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not equivalent to being ready to receive.

The Ultimate Authority In Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the directives of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to embrace data science and analytics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he announced that United’s style of play “will be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate football matters, drawing from his background in industry and sailing. Above all he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Who else could one trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a modern arena that looks similar to an abstract design, the signing of a new striker?

A Modern Football Hierarchy: Directors Above Managers

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with ideas and energy to go into an organization and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many companies have such individuals set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to determine the tactics by the directors and appoint someone who will adapt their methods to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more akin to delivery personnel: not creating the product, yet finally accountable if it arrives cold or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the public face for a club they can do little to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and effectively gets sacked for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined while those individuals who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

A Modern Corporate Game: Responsibility for the Coaches

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply corporate governance in action: the rise of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose errors can always be sacked away without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss them for playing too much that system. Hire the process guy and later bin him for taking excessive time. And above all be grateful; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – however well qualified – are in charge.