🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to restart atomic talks with Washington on condition that it is handled with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has announced.

Abbas Araghchi said exclusively dialogue worked, and disclosed recent overtures had originated from mediators to reopen discussions with the US government. He asserted Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Iran was not yet able to allow the global atomic watchdog to access struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Navigating a Complex Path

Araghchi is treading a challenging path since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be proceeding from a stance of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out stronger militarily and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material within its borders that it will never give up" – the key factor of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Prior Discussions Suddenly Terminated

The previous five rounds of discussions between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that ended with Donald Trump claiming the facilities had been obliterated. Afterward, European countries exercised their authority to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with US participation could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the talks that American atomic experts could function within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Officials asserted on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the arrangement to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Status

Tehran representatives declared the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the offer could be reintroduced in certain ways if negotiations restart.

The US president recently claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to restart talks, but in private Iranian officials claim they are not yet getting consistent overtures from America either directly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran states diplomacy is not part of a show.

Political Standpoint

In his remarks to the forum, intended to depict the US as a controlling nation that abuses the concept of global regulations, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict showed the clash could not be ended by combat operations. He stated the attacks commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were mounted with full US knowledge and coordination, making confidence difficult to reestablish.

Dialogue Continues the Ultimate Answer

Araghchi said: "It was not Iran that had fled negotiations; it was America and the European states that had always attempted to enforce their will during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be viable and continues the primary answer to settle conflicts, but its standards, guidelines and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"Provided that they address to the citizens of Tehran with the language of dignity and respect, they will obtain a response in the same approach."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the conflict of recovery and reconstruction, Araghchi said he was certain Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We learned multiple understandings from this war; we have identified our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He added: "We effectively endured this war. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to destroy, remains in place. The sites and gear, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but were unable to destroy. The Iranian people have grown more powerful, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the government and the state in the aftermath of this attack."